Portraits and Selfies

Under my bed there is a box. It is full of black and white and sepia photographs. It is my family pictorial archive.

I don’t look in it often, but, when I do, I turn them over in my hands carefully, for they are like old friends. All of them are dead now, of course, and most of them I never knew, or even met, personally, but in some strange way they feel known to me, open and strangely readable . . . they are, literally, familiar.

Here is one of them . . . it is of my great grandparents in about 1910.

Jim and Lizzie in about 1910

Jim and Lizzie in about 1910

In some important way it is different from the photos we take today.

There are technical reasons for this difference, of course. The long exposure times of early photography precluded action of any kind. Even smiling was difficult, as everyone who has experienced the excruciating difficulty of holding a smile for several minutes will testify.

After ten seconds it has become a grimace of embarrassment, not the universal sign of pleasure that the photographer and you wanted.

But the important thing about these photographs is inherent in the fact that I can put all the photos, covering more than a hundred years, in a single shoebox. It is their relative rarity that makes the images special.#

I don’t mean that so few have survived that they are like fish in the sea. No, they were rare in their own time, as well, and we probably still have most of them, even if many, perhaps most, are unidentified.

The selfie stick had not yet been invented . . .

Now we take hundreds of pictures a week. Here is a picture of me grinning somewhere. Can’t remember where it was. And here’s another picture of me with the same drunken grin in a really good place we went to in . . . oh, I’ve forgotten. What year was it? And her’s another grin, and another.

We are always grinning madly, as if we want to prove to ourselves, at some future date, that, yes, we really knew how to have a good time back then.

After all, when we are miserable, we don’t take photos of the misery. We just don’t take photos at funerals. They might reveal too much of the truth . . .

My grandparents didn’t take “snapshots” of their life together. There is no pictorial record of them drunk at someone’s party. Not even of their wedding day in faraway Droitwich.

So this is a one-off photograph of them as an elderly couple. It is their statement to the world and to the future. They are posing for a portrait, and would not dream of smiling or pulling a funny face, just as, with the exception of the Mona Lisa, people don’t smile in painted portraits.

They went to a studio in their best clothes, and composed themselves before a backdrop sky. This photograph was important. It was their statement to the future about who they were and where they had got to after a long life of hard work and prudence.

I can imagine how their voices would sound, how Jim would look at you sideways as though you were ten years old and been caught scrumping apples; and Lizzie would look at you straight and worried, as though it was a bit of a puzzle why you wanted to take the apples in the first place.

And this is, indeed, how they were.

Sam, carpet weaver

Sam, carpet weaver

Here is another. His name was Sam He was a carpet weaver in Stourbridge. He wasn’t a big cheese . . . he was an honest working man with a skilled job.

This is the only photograph of him, for he died soon after. But he sat for his portrait, in a jacket of rough cloth and a watch chain across his waistcoat. It may not have had a watch on the end of it, but he was consciously using the chain to signal his ambition.

This is a portrait of a young man, who wishes to be respectable but is not completely sure how to do it, as yet.

And what do our photos say about us? Out of all the thousands of photos we have taken of our lives, how many will survive to be put in a shoebox by our great grandchildren?

When our computers are examined by our descendants, will they still have Windows XP (or whatever)? Will they bother to try to open files that no longer open? Or will they just hit Delete?

Maybe they will persevere, and drag out our Facebook pictures. What will they make of all those parties and holidays?

The portrait photograph is no longer a gift to the future, a rare and rather precious communication to the next generation. Like most aspects of our culture, it has become trivialized, throwaway and totally forgettable.

About stevehobsonauthor

I am blind, and I hate it. It stinks. But life is still sweet. I have multiple sclerosis, and that stinks too, but life is still sweet. These are my musings.
This entry was posted in Age, Arts, History, Photographs and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Portraits and Selfies

  1. It is fascinating how photographs—which once represented a kind of permanence—have now evolved into something transient, deletable. I remember my excitement at getting my first digital camera, knowing I could take as many photos as I wanted without having to pay for the bad ones. That meant I didn’t have to think as hard about whether to take a photo. I didn’t have to worry about whether I’d set it up right or whether it was something I really wanted a picture of.

    I agree that something is lost in the proliferation of digital photos. With so many available, there’s nothing to suggest that any one is special. On the other hand, I was able to get a few fantastic photos in Gaspe while shooting from a moving car, and these came about only because there were a lot of bad photos mixed in there. (I saw a beautiful fog over the water and just clicked and clicked, hoping to get maybe one good one.) There were maybe five good ones, but those preserve what I saw and wanted to capture. The fog was moving fast (strange to think about, I know) and there was no time to set it up. I simply had to get lucky.

    Funny thing… I was supposed to submit a photo of myself for an article, but I couldn’t find one! I’m always the one taking the photo, and it’s usually of scenery. If I’m in the photo, I’m making a stupid face or doing something ridiculous that the public should not see. I guess that’s due to the transience of photography these days, and my feeling that it’s not to be taken as a monument for posterity. If I were to die tomorrow, my husband would have a hard time finding a decent photo of me for the newspaper!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Esme Gedge says:

    I really enjoyed reading your latest blog Steve. You’re right about the fact that we’re continually snapping with our digital cameras. Photos we probably won’t look at very often, if ever.

    I remember as a child sitting at the kitchen table many times looking at the family photos trying to identify who was who and how those people were related to me and my family.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Rebecca says:

    I just wanted to say I enjoyed this blog post, and your old photos are lovely. I have photocopies (sadly not the originals) of very old photos of my family who I never knew or met and I treasure these too.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s